Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Building Blocks Lives On at Western Michigan University

(I have more interviews scheduled within the next week to flesh this out for the final draft)


May 24, 2010. Monday. 9th week. Spring Quarter. Kim Cummings sent an email to all past participants of Building Blocks with the subject line "Calling all BB/09ers: Sad announcement to make." The contents of the email were brief and to the point: "I'm calling all BB/09s--sophomores, juniors, and seniors--to meet at the end of tonight's BB seminar, 10:00 p.m. in Dewing 310. I have a very sad announcement to make."

At the meeting, he revealed to Building Blocks classes past and present that Building Blocks was going to be removed from the curriculum. And then, Building Blocks 2010 participant Allie VanHeest says, "he sat down and we organized. We held discussions with administrators, rallied in Red Square, and led a letter-writing campaign."

Building Blocks, officially listed on class registration forms as ANSO 224: Neighborhood Organizing Practicum, began as a class at Kalamazoo College in the spring of 1995. Originally designed as a way for students to develop advanced organizing skills through working on community-based projects, Building Blocks, by its last years at Kalamazoo, functioned as half-theory, half-application intensive life experience. Students, in groups of three, worked specific blocks in neighborhoods in transition in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Given anywhere between $2,500 and $3,000 in grant money – depending on how generous donations were in any given year – student organizers worked with neighborhood association managers and resident advisors to rally neighborhood residents. The cover story was that residents would be given money to make exterior home improvements – maybe to buy paint, or flowers, or shrubs to pretty the place up; maybe to fix that hole in the porch; maybe to replace the window sills. The catch was that they had to work with their neighbors to actually get the work done. The goal? Building social capital, and creating a network of neighbors that each resident could potentially rely on if the need arose.

There is a lot of heartbreak and, yes, drama surrounding the decision to discontinue offering the class at Kalamazoo. Most people have no idea why the decision was made, and even less idea why it was enforced. The decision sparked a flurry of strong responses. The residents of one of the target blocks of Spring 2010, Lowden Street in Oakwood neighborhood, wrote a letter to the editor in the Kalamazoo Gazette stating that "We're sadden by the late breaking bulletin from Kalamazoo College Provost… about the possible demise of the Building Blocks Kalamazoo Program. We can only pray that he will reconsider and acknowledge the impact that this stellar program has had…. Let's save Michigan with neighbors helping neighbors."

Students rallied. Petitions circulated campus. People wrote alumni who previously participated, begging them to contact the Provost's office and ask them to reconsider the decision – to no avail.

Student Ben Ensroth remembers the situation differently than any of the protesters. One of the students on the interim committee for the Arcus Center for Social Justice Leadership, he had quite a bit of informal interactions with the Provost, and the President's staff. "They weren't going to change their minds," he says. "I didn't come down strongly on either side of it. The argument that it didn't really fit in with the curriculum held a lot of water. But still - did I wish they kept such a unique program? At the end of the day, yes, but it doesn't matter. Because it was such a hot button topic – the things I overheard from working with the president's staff and a lot of people from within anthropology/sociology on other things – the decision had been made. They weren't going to keep the program. It was going to get cut. There was really no hope of saving it."

Kim Cummings is the lifeblood behind the Building Blocks program. One of his stipulations for retirement was that he be permitted to continue teaching Building Blocks and his winter course, How To Change The World. He was informed of the decision to eliminate the Building Blocks program a while [check how long] before he informed his students. As soon as it was clear that Building Blocks would not be able to remain at Kalamazoo, either in the AnSo department or in the Philosophy department, as was briefly considered, Cummings started looking for alternate options.

He found his solution at Western Michigan University. The school of social work took Cummings – and the program – in. He recruited several K students, Allie VanHeest and Nicole Allman, to serve as TAs for the first year at Western. "Western was wonderfully receptive," he says. "Don Cooney from the School of Social Work knew about the program well… and was quick to encourage the school of social work to pick it up." A lot of that actually had to do with how students at Kalamazoo were rallying to keep the course. "People at Western were seeing how hard students were fighting for it at K," Kim says. He sees that as instrumental in Western's decision to pick up the course.

This spring marks the first year that no Kalamazoo students have been involved in Building Blocks since its inception. His current TA is a Western student, Erin Kaplan, and all of his students are also Western students currently attending Western Michigan's summer intensive session.

This transition, beyond Western's quick decision to integrate it into their curriculum, has not been easy for Kim, or for the program. "What's been hard is to get the number of students," he says. "I don't have the same connections at Western that I did at K."

He went to 22 different classes across several departments at Western and advertised the Building Blocks course to all the students in each class. "Kalamazoo is really unique," Cummings says. Western is a lot larger, and as such, word of mouth is not the driving force in drawing students to the program that it was at Kalamazoo. Still, many Western students seem to be interested in the program. Unfortunately, "Western students are more likely to be employed, part time or full time," Kim says. "Or they have other classes, so they can't spend as much time in the neighborhoods." Because of this, and the fact that Western's summer session is several weeks shorter than an academic quarter at Kalamazoo, he has had to make the course less academically demanding.

Additionally, students have less wiggle room to deal with possible setbacks. "They really have to do everything exactly on time because there's less forgiveness in the schedule," Kim says. Whereas, while the program was at K, students had several weeks to coax residents of the neighborhoods to participate, at Western, "they just have to do it, and if residents don't sign up at the start, it's really hard to integrate them."

The biggest problem arises with the fact that Western's summer session is not covered by financial aid. Many interested students had to withdraw their applications to participate in the Building Blocks class for financial reasons. As it stands, rather than three students per participating blocks, now only two – and, in one case, one – students are on a team.

Still, the community overall is still grateful to the program. The Eastside neighborhood has not applied to be part of the program for several years. Still, neighborhood association director Pat Taylor says, "People keep coming by the office and asking if it's going to be back this year. They really miss it."

Others agree. One resident of Vine neighborhood was overheard saying, "I saw the building blocks signs go up the other day. It's always great to see them there."

The Building Blocks board of directors is excited about the program's new home at Western Michigan University. Still, Kim is keeping his eyes open for other possible opportunities, in case it just doesn't stick there. As for the future – "Who knows?" Kim says. "If we just can't get enough students, maybe we'll move to resident organizers."

In any event, it seems that – for the time being – even though Building Blocks no longer has a home at Kalamazoo College, it will continue being a community presence for as long as possible.



5 comments:

  1. Saskia,

    First, I’d like to say that I think taking on this topic was a really good idea. I remember that there was ‘drama’ about building blocks my first-year spring but it seemed like all the information on the details of the protest was insider information. I think it’s also effective to do this kind of reporting after people have had time to process the change.

    In the first paragraph, when you say that Cummings said that BB would be cut from the curriculum, you could specify that it’s Kalamazoo College’s curriculum to avoid confusion and give the reader a better sense of place in case this isn’t for the Index. Or, if you want to keep the mystery alive until you reveal maybe just specify that it’s a college curriculum, again, just for a better sense and context for the reader. Same type of comment, when you say what the ‘cover story’ was, are you actually referring to a newspaper cover story? I think for the reader to trust a writer it’s good to be specific and for me this language is ambiguous. I do like how concise you are here though, ‘the story’, ‘the catch’, and ‘the goal’.

    Again, specificity, maybe I’m on some weird kick tonight but I’m looking for more of it. Can you name the Oakwood neighborhood resident who wrote the letter to the Gazette? And Ben Enroth’s quote is a very good view of a different side of the argument separate from the protests but it’s raising so many questions for me, the big one being why? And next, who? The same questions that I wanted answered two years ago.

    When did Kim Cummings retire? This would be helpful to know. Is Building Blocks at Western only a summer semester option? Whose decision was it? Which provost? And Why why why?

    I think you have some great quotes, and you explain the protest and the recovery well. But there’s a lot of middle that I want to know about, for example, once students understood that it was still going to exist did this ease worries? Be specific about the protest if possible were there multiple angles? What were the arguments? Great start but please answer why!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your opening paragraph has The Events of October written all over it stylistically, but I think I like it. It drew my attention into a topic that otherwise might not have seemed as gripping. You did a great job of describing the program, which I am unfamiliar with, and showing the community impact at the end.

    I'd like to know a little bit more about the decision to move the program. One of your sources mentions that the administration decided it didn't fit into the curriculum, but there must be more details. What happens to the grant money that used to be used for the class?

    Good use of sources. You talked to a lot of people and did a really thorough analysis of the situation. I learned a lot about something I had never bothered to research. Enjoyable reading!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Saskia,

    After finishing this article, I couldn't help but wonder where those targeted by BB are in this narrative? Did they care that BB had been cut? Did they look forward to the collaboration? This doesn't need to be main thread in the piece, but it seems like if this program is created with them in mind, they should have a say.

    I liked how your voice got more clear at the paragraph beginning with "There is a lot of heartbreak and, yes, drama surrounding the decision.." I like the conversationally frank tone you adopt, which feels right with this piece, like I'm a community member overhearing gossip about BB.

    I hope your continued research goes well, and you find more emotionally charged details.

    Elaine

    ReplyDelete
  4. Saskia –

    I'm glad Maggie mentioned it--I was definitely thinking Events of October when I read your first paragraph! I liked your use of email along with your other sources in this piece, and I think this is definitely a rich topic to write about.

    Just a question—is this an enterprise piece or a profile of building blocks? If it is the former, I think readers definitely need more information about the other side of the argument/ why it was taken out of the curriculum. I’m also curious if there was any negative reaction to the protestors. How did the Provost react? Did he? How did this announcement change the atmosphere on campus? Did it?

    For instance, when they said “it didn't really fit in with the curriculum”—what does this mean? How did Building Blocks not fit into anthropology?

    This is definitely a “hot topic” so your angle and focus is crucial. What do you want your focus to be? The shift from Western to K? The response the removal of the class elicited? Building Blocks’ impact on K? Do you want it to be more from Kim’s or a student standpoint? Or do you want to explain the problem with a more neutral voice?

    I like your lead so far, because it communicates a sense of urgency from the standpoint of students (9th week Monday of Spring Quarter ahhh!?!?!! ) and it sets up the conflict right away. At the same time, I wonder if it would be more effective to start with a scene from Building Blocks in action? And then readers who were unfamiliar with it would feel more disappointed when they found out it was canceled a paragraph or so later? Just something to think about.

    Maybe this doesn't have a place in this piece, but I'm curious if there have been any other times where classes have been cut and students responded in the same way. I guess I'm wondering how common cutting classes is.

    Good start so far!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Saskia,

    This is a great topic and you've done a lot of good research so far.

    I am left wondering though, WHY did Building Blocks end? I still don't understand even after reading your piece. You say that there is a lot of drama surrounding BB's demise.. what is it?? I understand that it's a very touchy subject on campus but if you haven't already talked to the provost, I would go ahead and do it. The line about it not fitting in with the K-College curriculum also perplexed me. I feel like it absolutely fits in with K's goals and style for learning.

    I would also talk to more students about how they feel about BB being cut. This is a huge deal on campus but I felt like not enough voices were represented. I know you said you have more interview to do this week, but I'd be curious to know if those interviews are primarily with students? faculty? provosts??

    This is an absolutely great start. I'm so excited to read you finished draft.

    Great job!

    Alaina

    ReplyDelete